Abbigale vs Abbott
American parents have registered 2,188 Abbigales since 1880, against 1,320 Abbotts. But in 2025 it was Abbott that was commoner, 27 babies to 6.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Abbigale Abbott
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 94 years in which either name was published, Abbott for 64 years and Abbigale for 30 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Abbigale | Abbott | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 2,188 | 1,320 |
| Most in one year | 128 | 59 |
| Babies in 2025 | 6 | 27 |
| Estimated living today | 2,200 | 940 |
| Median age today | 20 | 11 |
| Peak year | 2007 | 2016 |
| Best rank | 1,704th girls | 2,255th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 13,208th | 3,949th |
| First recorded | 1981 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 2,188 / 0 | 24 / 1,296 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Abbigales alive today are over 20; half the Abbotts are over 11. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Abbigale and Abbott.