Humanverse

Abigail vs Abigaile

American parents have registered 413,935 Abigails since 1880, against 614 Abigailes. Abigail is still ahead, with 4,941 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Abigail against Abigaile, 1880 to 2025 0 4k 8k 12k 16k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Abigail Abigaile

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Abigail has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2006, when Abigail had 15,649 and Abigaile had 42.

Side by side

  Abigail Abigaile
Total US births 413,935614
Most in one year 15,95542
Babies in 2025 4,941under 5
Estimated living today 407,000610
Median age today 1920
Peak year 20032006
Best rank 6th girls3,669th girls
Rank in 2025 41stunranked
First recorded 18801989
Girls / boys 413,263 / 672614 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Abigail Abigaile
England and Wales 45,94149
Ireland 3,1883

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Abigail and Abigaile.