Humanverse

Aela vs Aella

American parents have registered 708 Aelas since 1880, against 626 Aellas. Aela is still ahead, with 61 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Aela against Aella, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Aela Aella

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 20 years in which either name was published, Aela for 14 years and Aella for 6 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

Side by side

  Aela Aella
Total US births 708626
Most in one year 64104
Babies in 2025 6135
Estimated living today 700620
Median age today 65
Peak year 20242023
Best rank 2,694th girls1,903rd girls
Rank in 2025 2,778th4,067th
First recorded 20062008
Girls / boys 708 / 0626 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Aela Aella
France 1,23095
England and Wales 16459
Scotland 734

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Aela and Aella.