Ajah vs Ajay
American parents have registered 4,594 Ajays since 1880, against 1,481 Ajahs. Ajay is still ahead, with 63 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ajah Ajay
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ajay has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1964 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1999, when Ajah had 97 and Ajay had 104.
Side by side
| Ajah | Ajay | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,481 | 4,594 |
| Most in one year | 97 | 158 |
| Babies in 2025 | 13 | 63 |
| Estimated living today | 1,500 | 4,500 |
| Median age today | 22 | 20 |
| Peak year | 1999 | 2011 |
| Best rank | 1,688th girls | 1,143rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 7,885th | 2,230th |
| First recorded | 1978 | 1964 |
| Girls / boys | 1,481 / 0 | 5 / 4,589 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ajahs alive today are over 22; half the Ajays are over 20. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Ajah Louisiana (4.6×), Florida (4.3×), Virginia (4.0×)
- Ajay California (3.2×), New Jersey (3.1×), New York (2.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ajah and Ajay.