Alf vs Alford
American parents have registered 4,795 Alfords since 1880, against 1,130 Alfs. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Alf Alford
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 125 years in which either name was published, Alford for 119 years and Alf for 6 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.
- 1880–2019 Alford ahead, apart from 3 short spells
9 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Alf | Alford | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,130 | 4,795 |
| Most in one year | 38 | 106 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 170 | 1,600 |
| Median age today | 71 | 67 |
| Peak year | 1916 | 1930 |
| Best rank | 1,043rd boys | 582nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,130 | 5 / 4,790 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Alfs alive today are over 71; half the Alfords are over 67. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Alf North Dakota (58.8×), Minnesota (16.1×), New York (2.8×)
- Alford Mississippi (6.7×), Arkansas (5.9×), Alabama (5.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Alf and Alford.