Humanverse

Almer vs Almond

American parents have registered 881 Almers since 1880, against 617 Almonds. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Almer against Almond, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Almer Almond

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 78 years in which either name was published, Almer for 55 years and Almond for 23 years. The lead changed hands 24 times.

16 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Almer Almond
Total US births 881617
Most in one year 3726
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 110120
Median age today 8069
Peak year 19181919
Best rank 1,446th boys1,408th boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801882
Girls / boys 322 / 5590 / 617

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Almers alive today are over 80; half the Almonds are over 69. That is 11 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Almer and Almond.