Humanverse

Alois vs Alonza

American parents have registered 3,321 Alonzas since 1880, against 2,711 Aloises. But in 2025 it was Alois that was commoner, 8 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Alois against Alonza, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Alois Alonza

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 140 years in which either name was published, Alonza for 88 years and Alois for 52 years. The lead changed hands 24 times.

16 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Alois Alonza
Total US births 2,7113,321
Most in one year 11160
Babies in 2025 8under 5
Estimated living today 4001,500
Median age today 7260
Peak year 19181961
Best rank 592nd boys1,001st boys
Rank in 2025 8,910thunranked
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 186 / 2,5256 / 3,315

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Aloises alive today are over 72; half the Alonzas are over 60. That is 12 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Alois and Alonza.