Humanverse

Alonna vs Alora

American parents have registered 11,893 Aloras since 1880, against 2,646 Alonnas. Alora is still ahead, with 1,614 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Alonna against Alora, 1880 to 2025 0 500 1k 1.5k 2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Alonna Alora

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 77 years in which either name was published, Alora for 52 years and Alonna for 25 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.

8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Alonna Alora
Total US births 2,64611,893
Most in one year 1181,614
Babies in 2025 371,614
Estimated living today 2,60012,000
Median age today 174
Peak year 20082025
Best rank 1,824th girls195th girls
Rank in 2025 3,903rd195th
First recorded 19461918
Girls / boys 2,646 / 011,893 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Alonnas alive today are over 17; half the Aloras are over 4. That is 13 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Alonna and Alora.