Humanverse

Anabel vs Anabell

American parents have registered 9,815 Anabels since 1880, against 1,429 Anabells. Anabel is still ahead, with 33 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Anabel against Anabell, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Anabel Anabell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Anabel has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1882 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2023, when Anabel had 27 and Anabell had 12.

Side by side

  Anabel Anabell
Total US births 9,8151,429
Most in one year 29795
Babies in 2025 33under 5
Estimated living today 8,8001,400
Median age today 2517
Peak year 20142013
Best rank 911th girls2,032nd girls
Rank in 2025 4,265thunranked
First recorded 18821922
Girls / boys 9,780 / 351,429 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Anabels alive today are over 25; half the Anabells are over 17. That is 8 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Anabel Anabell
England and Wales 57551
Poland 4023

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Anabel and Anabell.