Humanverse

Ane vs Aneesh

American parents have registered 920 Aneeshes since 1880, against 290 Anes. Aneesh is still ahead, with 5 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ane against Aneesh, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ane Aneesh

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 59 years in which either name was published, Aneesh for 39 years and Ane for 20 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Ane Aneesh
Total US births 290920
Most in one year 1165
Babies in 2025 under 55
Estimated living today 270910
Median age today 3218
Peak year 19602005
Best rank 3,920th girls1,943rd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked12,008th
First recorded 19151975
Girls / boys 290 / 00 / 920

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Anes alive today are over 32; half the Aneeshes are over 18. That is 14 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Ane Aneesh
England and Wales 1572

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ane and Aneesh.