Angelica vs Angelynn
American parents have registered 93,538 Angelicas since 1880, against 674 Angelynns. Angelica is still ahead, with 398 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Angelica Angelynn
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Angelica has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1892 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1948, when Angelica had 46 and Angelynn had 6.
Side by side
| Angelica | Angelynn | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 93,538 | 674 |
| Most in one year | 3,412 | 36 |
| Babies in 2025 | 398 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 90,000 | 660 |
| Median age today | 31 | 17 |
| Peak year | 1996 | 2013 |
| Best rank | 97th girls | 4,076th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 707th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1892 | 1948 |
| Girls / boys | 93,217 / 321 | 674 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Angelicas alive today are over 31; half the Angelynns are over 17. That is 14 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Angelica New Mexico (3.7×), Arizona (3.3×), California (2.9×)
- Angelynn Texas (7.1×), California (4.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Angelica and Angelynn.