Ansell vs Ansleigh
American parents have registered 1,561 Ansleighs since 1880, against 6 Ansells. Ansleigh is still ahead, with 36 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ansell Ansleigh
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 35 years in which either name was published, Ansleigh for 34 years and Ansell for 1 year. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Ansell | Ansleigh | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 6 | 1,561 |
| Most in one year | 6 | 102 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 36 |
| Estimated living today | 1 | 1,500 |
| Median age today | 92 | 12 |
| Peak year | 1933 | 2014 |
| Best rank | 3,268th boys | 1,956th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 3,975th |
| First recorded | 1933 | 1989 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 6 | 1,561 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ansells alive today are over 92; half the Ansleighs are over 12. That is 80 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ansell and Ansleigh.