Humanverse

Ardell vs Arden

American parents have registered 16,085 Ardens since 1880, against 5,070 Ardells. Arden is still ahead, with 486 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ardell against Arden, 1880 to 2025 0 125 250 375 500 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ardell Arden

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 138 years in which either name was published, Arden for 110 years and Ardell for 28 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Ardell Arden
Total US births 5,07016,085
Most in one year 151486
Babies in 2025 under 5486
Estimated living today 1,50011,000
Median age today 7015
Peak year 19222024
Best rank 742nd girls942nd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked1,005th
First recorded 18891881
Girls / boys 2,635 / 2,4357,518 / 8,567

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Ardells alive today are over 70; half the Ardens are over 15. That is 55 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ardell and Arden.