Ardith vs Ardyth
American parents have registered 5,712 Ardiths since 1880, against 802 Ardyths. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ardith Ardyth
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ardith has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1904 to 1985. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1962, when Ardith had 28 and Ardyth had 11.
Side by side
| Ardith | Ardyth | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,712 | 802 |
| Most in one year | 182 | 35 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,900 | 270 |
| Median age today | 78 | 79 |
| Peak year | 1930 | 1935 |
| Best rank | 504th girls | 1,197th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1904 | 1912 |
| Girls / boys | 5,581 / 131 | 802 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ardith and Ardyth.