Humanverse

Aretha vs Aretta

American parents have registered 5,656 Arethas since 1880, against 1,142 Arettas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Aretha against Aretta, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Aretha Aretta

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 111 years in which either name was published, Aretha for 102 years and Aretta for 9 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

9 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Aretha Aretta
Total US births 5,6561,142
Most in one year 54333
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 4,300370
Median age today 5671
Peak year 19681923
Best rank 397th girls1,388th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19001900
Girls / boys 5,656 / 01,142 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Arettas alive today are over 71; half the Arethas are over 56. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Aretha and Aretta.