Aubry vs Auburn
American parents have registered 4,631 Aubrys since 1880, against 2,065 Auburns. But in 2025 it was Auburn that was commoner, 37 babies to 12.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Aubry Auburn
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 120 years in which either name was published, Aubry for 106 years and Auburn for 14 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.
10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Aubry | Auburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 4,631 | 2,065 |
| Most in one year | 188 | 57 |
| Babies in 2025 | 12 | 37 |
| Estimated living today | 3,700 | 1,600 |
| Median age today | 20 | 21 |
| Peak year | 2008 | 2015 |
| Best rank | 1,354th girls | 3,177th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 8,362nd | 4,352nd |
| First recorded | 1904 | 1890 |
| Girls / boys | 3,020 / 1,611 | 1,337 / 728 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Aubry and Auburn.