Bellah vs Belva
American parents have registered 7,960 Belvas since 1880, against 502 Bellahs. But in 2025 it was Bellah that was commoner, 7 babies to 5.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Bellah Belva
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 128 years in which either name was published, Belva for 105 years and Bellah for 23 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Bellah | Belva | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 502 | 7,960 |
| Most in one year | 42 | 184 |
| Babies in 2025 | 7 | 5 |
| Estimated living today | 500 | 2,100 |
| Median age today | 12 | 76 |
| Peak year | 2012 | 1927 |
| Best rank | 3,711th girls | 519th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 11,932nd | 14,942nd |
| First recorded | 2003 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 502 / 0 | 7,960 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Belvas alive today are over 76; half the Bellahs are over 12. That is 64 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Bellah California (6.0×), Texas (5.1×)
- Belva West Virginia (10.7×), South Dakota (7.2×), Oklahoma (3.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Bellah and Belva.