Bellamy vs Belma

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Bellamy Belma

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 86 years in which either name was published, Belma for 61 years and Bellamy for 25 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

• 1895–1986 Belma ahead
• 1993–1996 Bellamy ahead
• 1999–2002 Belma ahead
• 2003–2025 Bellamy ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Belmas alive today are over 52; half the Bellamys are over 4. That is 48 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Bellamy Oklahoma (2.3×), Florida (2.0×), North Carolina (1.9×)
• Belma Texas (10.4×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Bellamy vs Bella
• Bellamy vs Belinda
• Bellamy vs Belle
• Bellamy vs Belen
• Bellamy vs Belva
• Bellamy vs Bell
• Belma vs Bella
• Belma vs Belinda