Humanverse

Berkleigh vs Bertha

American parents have registered 208,807 Berthas since 1880, against 721 Berkleighs. But in 2025 it was Berkleigh that was commoner, 40 babies to 30.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Berkleigh against Bertha, 1880 to 2025 0 1.5k 3k 4.5k 6k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Berkleigh Bertha

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Bertha for 135 years and Berkleigh for 11 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Berkleigh Bertha
Total US births 721208,807
Most in one year 695,065
Babies in 2025 4030
Estimated living today 72036,000
Median age today 673
Peak year 20191918
Best rank 2,538th girls51st girls
Rank in 2025 3,712th4,546th
First recorded 19991880
Girls / boys 721 / 0207,870 / 937

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Berthas alive today are over 73; half the Berkleighs are over 6. That is 67 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Berkleigh and Bertha.