Breannah vs Brendan
American parents have registered 92,141 Brendans since 1880, against 555 Breannahs. Brendan is still ahead, with 195 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Breannah Brendan
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Brendan has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1912 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2006, when Breannah had 38 and Brendan had 2,171.
Side by side
| Breannah | Brendan | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 555 | 92,141 |
| Most in one year | 38 | 4,005 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 195 |
| Estimated living today | 550 | 88,000 |
| Median age today | 24 | 28 |
| Peak year | 2006 | 1999 |
| Best rank | 3,919th girls | 96th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 1,097th |
| First recorded | 1989 | 1912 |
| Girls / boys | 555 / 0 | 325 / 91,816 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Brendans alive today are over 28; half the Breannahs are over 24. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Breannah and Brendan.