Bruce vs Brunilda
American parents have registered 388,275 Bruces since 1880, against 1,057 Brunildas. Bruce is still ahead, with 558 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Bruce Brunilda
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Bruce has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1976, when Bruce had 1,706 and Brunilda had 21.
Side by side
| Bruce | Brunilda | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 388,275 | 1,057 |
| Most in one year | 14,693 | 50 |
| Babies in 2025 | 558 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 247,000 | 900 |
| Median age today | 66 | 63 |
| Peak year | 1956 | 1959 |
| Best rank | 33rd boys | 1,537th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 536th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1939 |
| Girls / boys | 1,395 / 386,880 | 1,057 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Bruces alive today are over 66; half the Brunildas are over 63. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Bruce Vermont (2.4×), Maine (2.2×), New Hampshire (2.1×)
- Brunilda New York (11.9×), New Jersey (1.4×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Bruce and Brunilda.