Brynn vs Brynne
American parents have registered 30,211 Brynns since 1880, against 2,709 Brynnes. Brynn is still ahead, with 774 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Brynn Brynne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 77 years in which either name was published, Brynn for 75 years and Brynne for 2 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Brynn | Brynne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 30,211 | 2,709 |
| Most in one year | 1,671 | 117 |
| Babies in 2025 | 774 | 44 |
| Estimated living today | 30,000 | 2,700 |
| Median age today | 13 | 23 |
| Peak year | 2011 | 2003 |
| Best rank | 192nd girls | 1,641st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 407th | 3,459th |
| First recorded | 1943 | 1952 |
| Girls / boys | 29,816 / 395 | 2,709 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Brynnes alive today are over 23; half the Brynns are over 13. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Brynn Utah (3.1×), Minnesota (2.7×), North Dakota (2.4×)
- Brynne Pennsylvania (4.5×), Utah (4.3×), California (2.4×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Brynn and Brynne.