Bush vs Bushra
American parents have registered 1,033 Bushras since 1880, against 80 Bushes. Bushra is still ahead, with 44 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Bush Bushra
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 54 years in which either name was published, Bushra for 43 years and Bush for 11 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Bush | Bushra | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 80 | 1,033 |
| Most in one year | 11 | 49 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 44 |
| Estimated living today | 16 | 1,000 |
| Median age today | 33 | 13 |
| Peak year | 1915 | 2014 |
| Best rank | 2,310th boys | 3,272nd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 3,459th |
| First recorded | 1889 | 1983 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 80 | 1,033 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Bushes alive today are over 33; half the Bushras are over 13. That is 20 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Bush and Bushra.