Calletana vs Callum
American parents have registered 16,089 Callums since 1880, against 13 Calletanas. Callum is still ahead, with 3,003 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Calletana Callum
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 45 years in which either name was published, Callum for 43 years and Calletana for 2 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Calletana | Callum | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 13 | 16,089 |
| Most in one year | 8 | 3,003 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 3,003 |
| Estimated living today | 0 | 16,000 |
| Median age today | 97 | 3 |
| Peak year | 1925 | 2025 |
| Best rank | 3,664th girls | 118th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 118th |
| First recorded | 1925 | 1983 |
| Girls / boys | 13 / 0 | 38 / 16,051 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Calletanas alive today are over 97; half the Callums are over 3. That is 94 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Calletana and Callum.