Cassandra vs Cassaundra
American parents have registered 171,384 Cassandras since 1880, against 2,393 Cassaundras. Cassandra is still ahead, with 463 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Cassandra Cassaundra
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Cassandra has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1902 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1947, when Cassandra had 378 and Cassaundra had 9.
Side by side
| Cassandra | Cassaundra | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 171,384 | 2,393 |
| Most in one year | 7,073 | 149 |
| Babies in 2025 | 463 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 163,000 | 2,300 |
| Median age today | 36 | 37 |
| Peak year | 1990 | 1989 |
| Best rank | 49th girls | 1,111th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 630th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1902 | 1947 |
| Girls / boys | 171,008 / 376 | 2,393 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Cassandra Arizona (1.8×), Nevada (1.7×), Alaska (1.5×)
- Cassaundra California (3.4×), Ohio (3.3×), Minnesota (1.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Cassandra and Cassaundra.