Chip vs Chirag
American parents have registered 3,493 Chips since 1880, against 667 Chirags. Chip is still ahead, with 24 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Chip Chirag
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 83 years in which either name was published, Chip for 57 years and Chirag for 26 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.
Side by side
| Chip | Chirag | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 3,493 | 667 |
| Most in one year | 171 | 33 |
| Babies in 2025 | 24 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 2,900 | 640 |
| Median age today | 58 | 35 |
| Peak year | 1962 | 1985 |
| Best rank | 593rd boys | 1,794th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 4,249th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1942 | 1973 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 3,493 | 0 / 667 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Chips alive today are over 58; half the Chirags are over 35. That is 23 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Chip Georgia (3.6×), Ohio (2.7×), North Carolina (2.3×)
- Chirag New Jersey (13.5×), Illinois (6.4×), California (2.2×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Chip and Chirag.