Humanverse

Clyda vs Clydia

American parents have registered 758 Clydas since 1880, against 626 Clydias. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Clyda against Clydia, 1880 to 2025 0 8 16 24 32 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Clyda Clydia

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 72 years in which either name was published, Clyda for 51 years and Clydia for 21 years. The lead changed hands 21 times.

13 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Clyda Clydia
Total US births 758626
Most in one year 2325
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 170210
Median age today 8077
Peak year 19241923
Best rank 1,811th girls1,672nd girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801900
Girls / boys 758 / 0626 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Clydas alive today are over 80; half the Clydias are over 77. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Clyda and Clydia.