Humanverse

Con vs Constance

American parents have registered 140,394 Constances since 1880, against 389 Cons. Constance is still ahead, with 142 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Con against Constance, 1880 to 2025 0 1.3k 2.5k 3.8k 5k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Con Constance

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Constance has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1892, when Con had 6 and Constance had 60.

Side by side

  Con Constance
Total US births 389140,394
Most in one year 134,451
Babies in 2025 under 5142
Estimated living today 14080,000
Median age today 7070
Peak year 19251950
Best rank 2,313th boys85th girls
Rank in 2025 unranked1,500th
First recorded 18921880
Girls / boys 0 / 389139,975 / 419

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Con Constance
Ireland 14392
Northern Ireland 1026

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Con and Constance.