Conor vs Constantina

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Conor Constantina

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 85 years in which either name was published, Conor for 54 years and Constantina for 31 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.

• 1917–1960 Constantina ahead
• 1961–1963 Conor ahead
• 1964–1968 Constantina ahead
• 1969 Conor ahead
• 1970–1975 Constantina ahead
• 1976–2025 Conor ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Constantinas alive today are over 43; half the Conors are over 22. That is 21 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Conor Massachusetts (3.5×), Connecticut (2.6×), New Hampshire (2.6×)
• Constantina New York (10.0×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Conor vs Connor
• Conor vs Connie
• Conor vs Constance
• Conor vs Conner
• Conor vs Conrad
• Conor vs Consuelo
• Constantina vs Connie
• Constantina vs Connor