Curley vs Curran
American parents have registered 3,124 Curleys since 1880, against 1,188 Currans. But in 2025 it was Curran that was commoner, 7 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Curley Curran
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 135 years in which either name was published, Curley for 88 years and Curran for 47 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.
Side by side
| Curley | Curran | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 3,124 | 1,188 |
| Most in one year | 83 | 56 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 7 |
| Estimated living today | 1,200 | 1,100 |
| Median age today | 69 | 27 |
| Peak year | 1944 | 1993 |
| Best rank | 754th boys | 1,601st boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 9,714th |
| First recorded | 1881 | 1916 |
| Girls / boys | 534 / 2,590 | 30 / 1,158 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Curleys alive today are over 69; half the Currans are over 27. That is 42 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Curley Louisiana (31.6×), Mississippi (8.9×), Alabama (2.6×)
- Curran California (8.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Curley and Curran.