Humanverse

Cybele vs Cybil

American parents have registered 593 Cybils since 1880, against 156 Cybeles. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Cybele against Cybil, 1880 to 2025 0 13 25 38 50 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Cybele Cybil

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 58 years in which either name was published, Cybil for 48 years and Cybele for 10 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Cybele Cybil
Total US births 156593
Most in one year 1748
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 140570
Median age today 5740
Peak year 19661975
Best rank 3,040th girls1,877th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19631970
Girls / boys 156 / 0593 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Cybeles alive today are over 57; half the Cybils are over 40. That is 17 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Cybele Cybil
France 28515

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Cybele and Cybil.