Humanverse

Daekwon vs Daelyn

American parents have registered 2,499 Daelyns since 1880, against 220 Daekwons. Daelyn is still ahead, with 101 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Daekwon against Daelyn, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Daekwon Daelyn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 33 years in which either name was published, Daelyn for 31 years and Daekwon for 2 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.

Side by side

  Daekwon Daelyn
Total US births 2202,499
Most in one year 37130
Babies in 2025 under 5101
Estimated living today 2202,500
Median age today 2712
Peak year 19962011
Best rank 2,218th boys2,073rd girls
Rank in 2025 unranked3,100th
First recorded 19951986
Girls / boys 0 / 2201,650 / 849

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Daekwons alive today are over 27; half the Daelyns are over 12. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Daekwon and Daelyn.