Humanverse

Darcia vs Darrell

American parents have registered 160,952 Darrells since 1880, against 543 Darcias. Darrell is still ahead, with 97 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Darcia against Darrell, 1880 to 2025 0 1.3k 2.5k 3.8k 5k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Darcia Darrell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Darrell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1886 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1990, when Darcia had 9 and Darrell had 1,137.

Side by side

  Darcia Darrell
Total US births 543160,952
Most in one year 284,797
Babies in 2025 under 597
Estimated living today 480113,000
Median age today 5959
Peak year 19571958
Best rank 2,067th girls90th boys
Rank in 2025 unranked1,688th
First recorded 19461886
Girls / boys 543 / 01,186 / 159,766

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Darcia Darrell
England and Wales 47269

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Darcia and Darrell.