Dardanella vs Darren
American parents have registered 104,506 Darrens since 1880, against 50 Dardanellas. Darren is still ahead, with 187 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Dardanella Darren
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 89 years in which either name was published, Darren for 85 years and Dardanella for 4 years. The lead changed hands once.
- 1920–1924 Dardanella ahead
- 1936–2025 Darren ahead
Side by side
| Dardanella | Darren | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 50 | 104,506 |
| Most in one year | 23 | 5,963 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 187 |
| Estimated living today | 0 | 94,000 |
| Median age today | 103 | 49 |
| Peak year | 1920 | 1965 |
| Best rank | 1,751st girls | 52nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 1,132nd |
| First recorded | 1920 | 1936 |
| Girls / boys | 50 / 0 | 569 / 103,937 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Dardanellas alive today are over 103; half the Darrens are over 49. That is 54 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dardanella and Darren.