Daric vs Darryl
American parents have registered 93,419 Darryls since 1880, against 607 Darics. Darryl is still ahead, with 69 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Daric Darryl
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Darryl has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1913 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2007, when Daric had 11 and Darryl had 242.
Side by side
| Daric | Darryl | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 607 | 93,419 |
| Most in one year | 26 | 5,178 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 69 |
| Estimated living today | 570 | 75,000 |
| Median age today | 40 | 59 |
| Peak year | 1976 | 1961 |
| Best rank | 1,873rd boys | 80th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,108th |
| First recorded | 1961 | 1913 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 607 | 1,134 / 92,285 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Darryls alive today are over 59; half the Darics are over 40. That is 19 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Daric and Darryl.