Humanverse

Darold vs Darryl

American parents have registered 93,419 Darryls since 1880, against 4,195 Darolds. Darryl is still ahead, with 69 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Darold against Darryl, 1880 to 2025 0 1.5k 3k 4.5k 6k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Darold Darryl

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 114 years in which either name was published, Darryl for 92 years and Darold for 22 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Darold Darryl
Total US births 4,19593,419
Most in one year 995,178
Babies in 2025 under 569
Estimated living today 2,00075,000
Median age today 6459
Peak year 19321961
Best rank 592nd boys80th boys
Rank in 2025 unranked2,108th
First recorded 19121913
Girls / boys 0 / 4,1951,134 / 92,285

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Darolds alive today are over 64; half the Darryls are over 59. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Darold and Darryl.