Humanverse

Dawayne vs Dawna

American parents have registered 6,017 Dawnas since 1880, against 1,690 Dawaynes. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Dawayne against Dawna, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Dawayne Dawna

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 105 years in which either name was published, Dawna for 74 years and Dawayne for 31 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Dawayne Dawna
Total US births 1,6906,017
Most in one year 45264
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 1,5005,100
Median age today 3958
Peak year 19771966
Best rank 1,356th boys579th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19291919
Girls / boys 0 / 1,6906,017 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Dawnas alive today are over 58; half the Dawaynes are over 39. That is 19 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dawayne and Dawna.