Deanne vs Dearl
American parents have registered 14,856 Deannes since 1880, against 792 Dearls. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Deanne Dearl
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 101 years in which either name was published, Deanne for 85 years and Dearl for 16 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.
Side by side
| Deanne | Dearl | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 14,856 | 792 |
| Most in one year | 602 | 24 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 12,000 | 370 |
| Median age today | 58 | 66 |
| Peak year | 1962 | 1933 |
| Best rank | 383rd girls | 1,361st boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1919 | 1917 |
| Girls / boys | 14,851 / 5 | 0 / 792 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Dearls alive today are over 66; half the Deannes are over 58. That is 8 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Deanne and Dearl.