Dewanna vs Dewayne
American parents have registered 26,598 Dewaynes since 1880, against 727 Dewannas. Dewayne is still ahead, with 55 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Dewanna Dewayne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Dewayne has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1912 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1957, when Dewanna had 30 and Dewayne had 428.
Side by side
| Dewanna | Dewayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 727 | 26,598 |
| Most in one year | 30 | 655 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 55 |
| Estimated living today | 640 | 21,000 |
| Median age today | 55 | 51 |
| Peak year | 1957 | 1962 |
| Best rank | 1,989th girls | 303rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,451st |
| First recorded | 1930 | 1912 |
| Girls / boys | 727 / 0 | 107 / 26,491 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Dewannas alive today are over 55; half the Dewaynes are over 51. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dewanna and Dewayne.