Humanverse

Dian vs Dianne

American parents have registered 95,475 Diannes since 1880, against 5,578 Dians. Dianne is still ahead, with 21 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Dian against Dianne, 1880 to 2025 0 1.3k 2.5k 3.8k 5k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Dian Dianne

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 112 years in which either name was published, Dianne for 110 years and Dian for 2 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

Side by side

  Dian Dianne
Total US births 5,57895,475
Most in one year 2874,421
Babies in 2025 1121
Estimated living today 3,90070,000
Median age today 7171
Peak year 19461947
Best rank 459th girls83rd girls
Rank in 2025 unranked5,722nd
First recorded 19121911
Girls / boys 5,369 / 20995,289 / 186

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Dian Dianne
England and Wales 7536
France 1035

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dian and Dianne.