Humanverse

Earla vs Earle

American parents have registered 11,790 Earles since 1880, against 742 Earlas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Earla against Earle, 1880 to 2025 0 100 200 300 400 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Earla Earle

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Earle has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2014. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1949, when Earla had 28 and Earle had 119.

Side by side

  Earla Earle
Total US births 74211,790
Most in one year 28358
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 3302,600
Median age today 7569
Peak year 19491918
Best rank 1,807th girls293rd boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19121880
Girls / boys 742 / 0285 / 11,505

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Earlas alive today are over 75; half the Earles are over 69. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Earla and Earle.