Humanverse

Earle vs Earlene

American parents have registered 14,170 Earlenes since 1880, against 11,790 Earles. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Earle against Earlene, 1880 to 2025 0 125 250 375 500 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Earle Earlene

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 129 years in which either name was published, Earle for 71 years and Earlene for 58 years. The lead changed hands 20 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Earle Earlene
Total US births 11,79014,170
Most in one year 358407
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 2,6006,700
Median age today 6974
Peak year 19181947
Best rank 293rd boys401st girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801901
Girls / boys 285 / 11,50514,165 / 5

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Earlenes alive today are over 74; half the Earles are over 69. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Earle and Earlene.