Humanverse

Elleana vs Elliott

American parents have registered 70,719 Elliotts since 1880, against 510 Elleanas. Elliott is still ahead, with 2,776 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Elleana against Elliott, 1880 to 2025 0 800 1.6k 2.4k 3.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Elleana Elliott

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Elliott has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2005, when Elleana had 21 and Elliott had 751.

Side by side

  Elleana Elliott
Total US births 51070,719
Most in one year 283,126
Babies in 2025 222,776
Estimated living today 51062,000
Median age today 1211
Peak year 20122019
Best rank 4,957th girls161st boys
Rank in 2025 5,554th160th
First recorded 19971880
Girls / boys 510 / 08,168 / 62,551

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Elleana Elliott
England and Wales 1217,508

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Elleana and Elliott.