Humanverse

Elliot vs Ellwood

American parents have registered 65,600 Elliots since 1880, against 1,979 Ellwoods. Elliot is still ahead, with 2,658 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Elliot against Ellwood, 1880 to 2025 0 800 1.6k 2.4k 3.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Elliot Ellwood

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 141 years in which either name was published, Elliot for 123 years and Ellwood for 18 years. The lead changed hands 20 times.

14 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Elliot Ellwood
Total US births 65,6001,979
Most in one year 2,93282
Babies in 2025 2,658under 5
Estimated living today 61,000310
Median age today 1174
Peak year 20221918
Best rank 150th boys692nd boys
Rank in 2025 151stunranked
First recorded 18801882
Girls / boys 7,008 / 58,5920 / 1,979

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Ellwoods alive today are over 74; half the Elliots are over 11. That is 63 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Elliot and Ellwood.