Humanverse

Emmalyn vs Emmitt

American parents have registered 14,249 Emmitts since 1880, against 8,847 Emmalyns. Emmitt is still ahead, with 339 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Emmalyn against Emmitt, 1880 to 2025 0 200 400 600 800 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Emmalyn Emmitt

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Emmitt for 130 years and Emmalyn for 16 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.

Side by side

  Emmalyn Emmitt
Total US births 8,84714,249
Most in one year 693571
Babies in 2025 204339
Estimated living today 8,80010,000
Median age today 1010
Peak year 20152019
Best rank 456th girls500th boys
Rank in 2025 1,137th769th
First recorded 19461880
Girls / boys 8,847 / 011 / 14,238

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Emmalyn Emmitt
England and Wales 183

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Emmalyn and Emmitt.