Humanverse

Etha vs Ethelyn

American parents have registered 4,450 Ethelyns since 1880, against 1,802 Ethas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Etha against Ethelyn, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Etha Ethelyn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 96 years in which either name was published, Ethelyn for 88 years and Etha for 8 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Etha Ethelyn
Total US births 1,8024,450
Most in one year 55168
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 270670
Median age today 7678
Peak year 19201920
Best rank 989th girls550th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 1,802 / 04,450 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Ethelyns alive today are over 78; half the Ethas are over 76. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Etha and Ethelyn.