Felecia vs Feliz
American parents have registered 10,268 Felecias since 1880, against 670 Felizes. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Felecia Feliz
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 104 years in which either name was published, Felecia for 86 years and Feliz for 18 years. The lead changed hands 16 times.
- 1908–1919 Felecia ahead, apart from one short spell
- 1922–1928 Feliz ahead
- 1936–2012 Felecia ahead, apart from 2 short spells
11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Felecia | Feliz | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 10,268 | 670 |
| Most in one year | 422 | 19 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 9,200 | 450 |
| Median age today | 54 | 40 |
| Peak year | 1963 | 1978 |
| Best rank | 470th girls | 4,931st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1908 | 1901 |
| Girls / boys | 10,268 / 0 | 380 / 290 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Felecias alive today are over 54; half the Felizes are over 40. That is 14 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Felecia and Feliz.