Fernando vs Ferol
American parents have registered 103,729 Fernandos since 1880, against 628 Ferols. Fernando is still ahead, with 819 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Fernando Ferol
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 144 years in which either name was published, Fernando for 131 years and Ferol for 13 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.
11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Fernando | Ferol | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 103,729 | 628 |
| Most in one year | 2,765 | 24 |
| Babies in 2025 | 819 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 94,000 | 100 |
| Median age today | 27 | 81 |
| Peak year | 2006 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 151st boys | 1,867th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 387th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1889 |
| Girls / boys | 590 / 103,139 | 618 / 10 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ferols alive today are over 81; half the Fernandos are over 27. That is 54 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Fernando and Ferol.