Fredda vs Freddy
American parents have registered 26,968 Freddys since 1880, against 1,477 Freddas. Freddy is still ahead, with 127 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Fredda Freddy
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 121 years in which either name was published, Freddy for 111 years and Fredda for 10 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.
Side by side
| Fredda | Freddy | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,477 | 26,968 |
| Most in one year | 61 | 441 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 127 |
| Estimated living today | 720 | 20,000 |
| Median age today | 74 | 39 |
| Peak year | 1948 | 1947 |
| Best rank | 1,144th girls | 327th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 1,421st |
| First recorded | 1895 | 1896 |
| Girls / boys | 1,477 / 0 | 172 / 26,796 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Freddas alive today are over 74; half the Freddys are over 39. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Fredda New York (6.4×), Texas (4.0×), Tennessee (2.6×)
- Freddy Arkansas (2.8×), New Mexico (2.6×), Texas (2.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Fredda and Freddy.