Garland vs Garner
American parents have registered 24,712 Garlands since 1880, against 2,338 Garners. But in 2025 it was Garner that was commoner, 20 babies to 12.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Garland Garner
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Garland for 132 years and Garner for 14 years. The lead changed hands 11 times.
Side by side
| Garland | Garner | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 24,712 | 2,338 |
| Most in one year | 499 | 82 |
| Babies in 2025 | 12 | 20 |
| Estimated living today | 9,700 | 1,300 |
| Median age today | 64 | 29 |
| Peak year | 1922 | 1932 |
| Best rank | 258th boys | 674th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,803rd | 5,861st |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 855 / 23,857 | 59 / 2,279 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Garlands alive today are over 64; half the Garners are over 29. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Garland Virginia (6.7×), West Virginia (5.2×), Arkansas (5.0×)
- Garner Tennessee (11.4×), Kentucky (8.6×), Texas (6.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Garland and Garner.